Understanding Crowd Dynamics and Disaster Risks in Kerala Temple Festivals: Strategies for Effective Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2024.6.2.17Keywords:
crowd dymanics, crowd-induced disasters, temple festivals, stampedes, public safetyAbstract
Temple festivals in Kerala are vibrant cultural events that draw massive crowds, creating a complex environment where crowd dynamics can pose significant disaster risks. The large number of attendees, combined with limited space and inadequate safety measures, makes these festivals vulnerable to incidents such as stampedes, fires, and structural collapses. Despite the recurrence of crowd-induced disasters, there remains a gap in comprehensive disaster management strategies tailored to these unique events. This paper examines the critical aspects of crowd behaviour during Kerala's temple festivals and the associated disaster risks. It explores past incidents to identify key risk factors and assesses current preparedness and response mechanisms. This study explored a mixed-methods approach to examine crowd dynamics and disaster risks in Kerala temple festivals. Primary data were collected through field observations and semi-structured interviews with festival organizers, local authorities, and participants. Secondary data included incident reports and archival records of past festivals. The findings were synthesized to propose evidence-based management strategies. The analysis revealed critical risk factors associated with crowd dynamics during Kerala temple festivals, including overcrowding in confined spaces, inadequate evacuation routes, and lack of real-time communication systems. GIS-based spatial mapping highlighted congestion hotspots and high-risk zones. Interviews with stakeholders identified gaps in preparedness and coordination among organizers and emergency services. The proposed management strategies demonstrated the potential to mitigate risks, enhance crowd safety, and ensure efficient emergency response. Effective crowd management at temple festivals requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves spatial analysis, stakeholder collaboration, and robust catastrophe preparedness. The study highlights the significance of conducting preventive risk assessments and dynamic crowd monitoring techniques to avoid disasters. Implementing the proposed measures can considerably improve public safety, serve as a model for comparable cultural events, and help to shape legislation for disaster risk reduction in large crowds.
Downloads
References
Aktar, M. A., Shohani, K., Hasan, M. N., & Hasan, M. K. (2021). Flood Vulnerability Assessment by Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI) Method: A Study on Sirajganj Sadar Upazila. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 3(1), 1-14.
Bala, K. (2018). Crowd management: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3).
Carla S, R. G. (2019). School-community collaboration: disaster preparedness towards building resilient communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1(2), 45-59.
Cvetković, V., Šišović, V. (2024). Community Disaster Resilience in Serbia. Belgrade: Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management
Deshpande, N. P., & Gupta, R. (2010). Crowd management using fuzzy logic and GIS. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, 43.
Devasia, T. K. (2016). Kerala temple fire: Will the state finally ban dangerous fireworks displays? Scroll. in. Retrieved from https://scroll.in/article/806455/kerala-temple-fire-will-the-state-finally-ban-dangerous-fireworks-displays
Gurukkal, R. (2018). Yes, Sabarimala is in peril, but not the way you think. Outlook India. Retrieved from https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/yes-sabarimala-is-in-peril-but-not-the-way-you-think/300818
Illiyas, F. T., Faisel, M., & Mohan, K. (2015). Safety in religious mass gatherings: Guidelines for event organisers and stakeholder agencies. Institute of Land and Disaster Management, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Government of Kerala. Retrieved from https://sdma.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ILDM_2015.pdf
Illiyas, F. T., Mani, S. K., & Mohan, K. (2020). Carrying capacity assessment for religious crowd management: An application to Sabarimala mass gathering pilgrimage, India. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 8(1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348525529_Crowd_Management_-An_Application_to_Sabarimala_Mass_Gathering_Pilgrimage_India
Illiyas, F. T., Mani, S. K., Mohan, K., & Kumar, K. (2013). Human stampedes during religious festivals: A comparative review of mass gathering emergencies in India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 10–18.
Kumar, G. P. (2016, April 10). Kerala temple fire tragedy: Why temple sites in the state are disaster zones during festivals. Firstpost. Retrieved from https://www.firstpost.com/india/kerala-temple-fire-tragedy-why-temple-sites-in-the-state-are-disaster-zones-during-festivals-2721500.html
Lancet Infectious Diseases. (2010). Mass gathering medicine. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 10(10), 653. Retrieved from http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(10)70204-8/fulltext
Mohan Das, K., Nayar, R., & Shaffi, M. (2015). A perilous pilgrimage: The case of Sabarimala. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(25). Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/25/reports-states-web-exclusives/perilous-pilgrimage.html
Parkash, S. (2016). Brief report on reconnaissance study of Puttingal Temple fire incident (Sunday, 10 April 2016), Paravur, Kollam District, Kerala State. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1782.4249
Port, K. J. N., & Jawahar, G. (2024). Management of COVID: The Creeping Disaster in the Indian Scenario. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(1), 103–110.
PTI. (2016, April 10). 106 killed, 383 injured in Kerala temple fire. Deccan Herald. Retrieved from https://www.deccanherald.com/india/106-killed-383-injured-in-kerala-temple-fire-519724.html
Satisan, T. (2016). Obsession ends in tragedy. Organiser. Retrieved from https://organiser.org/2016/04/18/67306/general/rd563e3cc/
Soo, J., & Avery, J. (2003). Emergency/disaster guidelines and procedures for employees. CCH Canadian Limited.
Sudar, S., Cvetković, V. M., & Ivanov, A. (2024). Harmonization of Soft Power and Institutional Skills: Montenegro’s Path to Accession to the European Union in the Environmental Sector. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 6(1), 41–74.
Thummarukudy, M. (2016). Kerala temple fire: Time for better planning. Deccan Chronicle.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2008). Public health for mass gatherings: Key considerations. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Disaster Risk Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal operates under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, adaptation, and transformation in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
Authors retain the copyright of their articles.
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Management (IJDRM) encourages and permits authors to:
-
Post pre-print (submitted version), post-print (accepted version), and publisher’s version/PDF of their articles on personal websites, institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and academic networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, or departmental websites,
-
Do so at any time, including before or after publication,
-
Provided that appropriate credit is given to the original publication in this journal, including:
-
Full bibliographic details
-
A clear mention of the journal name
-
A direct link to the article’s DOI (as an HTML link)
-
No prior permission is required from the publisher or editors for such actions, as long as the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license are followed.