Bridging the Gap Between Preparedness and Performance: A Conceptual Framework for Activation Readiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66050/w3wf1m11Keywords:
preparedness, activation readiness, emergency management, adult learning, vested interest, performance measurementAbstract
Preparedness programs often produce plans, policies, exercises, and training-completion metrics, yet real incidents and exercises continue to reveal gaps between documented preparedness and operational performance. Common breakdowns include delayed decision-making, unclear authority, inconsistent role execution, incomplete handoffs, and communication drift during the early stages of an incident. This article introduces the Preparedness Activation Model (PAM) as a conceptual, evidence-informed framework for examining how organizations may strengthen activation readiness under pressure. PAM links three interrelated components: adult learning, vested-interest-based motivation, and activation design. The manuscript distinguishes the conceptual model from a proposed implementation toolkit and evaluation framework. The toolkit includes vendor-neutral routines such as a one-page Operating Picture, five-minute decision huddle, plain-language message maps, micro-exercises, and minimal performance metrics. The evaluation framework proposes measurable indicators, including time-to-decision, decision quality, message consistency, role adherence, handoff completeness, communication accuracy, and corrective-action closure. The article also presents a proposed 30–60–90-day implementation protocol and outlines a pilot-study design for future empirical testing. PAM is not presented as a validated cross-sector intervention; rather, it is offered as a practical framework for further study, local adaptation, and comparative evaluation across emergency management, education, healthcare, utilities, public-sector, and private-sector continuity contexts.
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
3. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. doi:10.1177/0149206309352880
4. Cvetković, V. M. (2025). First responders in the Western Balkans: Strengthening capacities and preparedness for a resilient future. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 361–384. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.19
5. Cvetković, V. M. (2026). Disaster risk management: Theory, concepts and methods (2nd ed.). Belgrade, Serbia: Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management.
6. Cvetković, V. M., & Janković, B. (2020). Private security preparedness for disasters caused by natural and anthropogenic hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2(1), 23–33. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2020.2.1.3
7. Desalit, P., Duque, G. B., Edradan, T. M., Enciso, K. H., Enriquez, M. R., & Pan, W. K. M. (2025). Predictors of disaster response self-efficacy among adult residents in selected highly-dense barangays in Tondo, Manila. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 301–312. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.17
8. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
9. Fox, J. A., & Savage, J. (2009). Mass murder goes to college: An examination of changes on college campuses following Virginia Tech. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(10), 1465–1485. doi:10.1177/0002764209332558
10. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
11. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III, & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
13. Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616–632. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
14. Masaba, A. K., Aryatwijuka, W., Ntayi, J. M., & Bagire, V. (2025). Network structure in disaster response: The mediating role of coordination within a humanitarian organizational network in Uganda. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 39–54. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.3
15. Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, Article 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
16. Miller, C. H., Adame, B. J., & Moore, S. D. (2013). Vested interest theory and disaster preparedness. Disasters, 37(1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01290.x
17. Morshead, R. W. (1965). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook II: Affective domain. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 4(1), 164–170. doi:10.1007/BF00373956
18. Razia, B. (2025). Guardians of safety: Assessing awareness and preparedness of teachers along with school initiatives for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 325–338. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.19
19. Regehr, C., Glancy, G. D., Carter, A., & Ramshaw, L. (2017). A comprehensive approach to managing threats of violence on a university or college campus. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 54, 140–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.06.009
20. Sacyaten, C. S. (2025). Crisis communication in times of disasters: Public perceptions on the timeliness and clarity of safety announcements: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 193–208. doi:10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.11
21. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134
22. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Crown Business.
23. Shusko, R. (2024). How do the perceptions and experiences of faculty and staff influence the development and shaping of the safety culture at a community college? A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation, Frostburg State University). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Publication No. 3071949347)
24. Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 210–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.210
25. Skurka, C., Reynolds-Tylus, T., Quick, B. L., & Hartman, D. (2020). What’s at stake: Evaluating a run-hide-fight intervention video through the lens of vested interest theory. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 982–989. doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1885084
26. Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
27. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
28. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Practical information on crisis planning: A guide for schools and communities. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-ED-PURL-LPS118483/pdf/GOVPUB-ED-PURL-LPS118483.pdf
29. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Action guide for emergency management at institutions of higher education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-ED-PURL-LPS125156/pdf/GOVPUB-ED-PURL-LPS125156.pdf
30. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Yamah, D., & Folorunsho, T. (2026). Leveraging social media and mobile technology for disaster communication in Nigeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 8(1), 1–30. doi:10.66050/x77jr639
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Robin Shusko (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Management (IJDRM) publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, adaptation, and transformation of the published material in any format or medium, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is included, and any modifications are clearly indicated.
Authors retain the copyright to their articles and grant IJDRM the right of first publication.
IJDRM permits and encourages authors to deposit and share all versions of their manuscripts, including:
- the preprint or submitted manuscript;
- the accepted manuscript or postprint;
- the published version of record, including the final publisher’s PDF.
These versions may be deposited or shared, without an embargo, through:
- personal or professional websites;
- institutional and disciplinary repositories;
- university or departmental websites;
- academic networking platforms, including ResearchGate and Academia.edu;
- other non-commercial or commercial platforms permitted under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Authors may deposit or share their work at any time, either before or after formal publication.
When sharing the accepted manuscript or published version of record, authors should provide:
- the complete bibliographic citation;
- the full title of the journal;
- a clear statement that the article was originally published in IJDRM;
- a direct, clickable link to the article’s DOI and official journal webpage;
- an indication of any changes made to the original published version, where applicable.
No prior permission from the publisher or editorial office is required for depositing, reproducing, distributing, or otherwise reusing an article, provided that all uses comply with the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
