Assessing Local Disaster Governance in Coastal Bangladesh: Comparing Institutional and Community Perspectives on Disaster Management Committees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66050/3cawjv12Keywords:
local disaster governance, disaster management committees, coastal Bangladesh, institutional self-assessment, community perception, community satisfaction, accountabilityAbstract
Despite substantial investments in decentralized disaster governance, Bangladesh’s coastal regions remain highly vulnerable to climate-induced hazards. Disaster Management Committees (DMCs) were established to enhance local preparedness, response, and recovery through participatory governance. However, empirical evidence on their effectiveness at the community level remains limited. This study examines the institutional capacity, operational effectiveness, and governance legitimacy of DMCs in two disaster-prone coastal upazilas: Dumki and Kalapara of Patuakhali District. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a community survey (N = 100) with key informant interviews (N = 30). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and four composite indices were constructed: Community Awareness Index (CAI), Community Satisfaction Index (CSI), Institutional Capacity Index (ICI), and Operational Effectiveness Index (OEI). Qualitative data were analyzed thematically to contextualize institutional practices and explain the gap between institutional claims and community experience. The findings reveal a pronounced disconnect between institutional self-assessment and community-level perceptions. Community awareness of DMCs was very low (CAI = 0.07), and community satisfaction with DMC performance was also very low (CSI = 0.04), indicating limited public engagement and weak service visibility. In contrast, DMC members reported very high institutional capacity (ICI = 0.95) and ceiling-level operational effectiveness (OEI = 1.00), suggesting a substantial mismatch between institutional perceptions and community realities. Union-wise differences in awareness and satisfaction were limited and not statistically significant. Firth penalized logistic regression likewise did not identify any statistically significant predictor of community satisfaction, indicating that dissatisfaction was broad-based rather than confined to specific respondent groups or locations. Overall, the results suggest that decentralization alone is insufficient to ensure participatory and effective disaster governance without accountability, transparency, and sustained community engagement. The study highlights the importance of community-validated performance measures and stronger accountability mechanisms for improving local disaster risk governance in climate-vulnerable settings.
Downloads
References
1. Alam, E., & Collins, A. E. (2010). Cyclone disaster vulnerability and response experiences in coastal Bangladesh. Disasters, 34(4), 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01176.x
2. Alcántara-Ayala, I., Velásquez-Espinoza, G., & Montes de Jesús, A. (2025). From mandates to mechanisms: Institutional vulnerability, decentralized governance, and the challenges of implementing local disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 16, 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00673-y
3. Bonfanti, R. C., Oberti, B., Ravazzoli, E., Rinaldi, A., Ruggieri, S., & Schimmenti, A. (2024). The role of trust in disaster risk reduction: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010029
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Canete, R. M., Lisay, S. K., & Mahmud, M. N. S. (2025). Project DINGGIN: Empowering communities through risk-based and inclusive cash transfer in disaster-prone areas in Bangladesh and Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.20
6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Cvetković, V. (2026). Disaster Risk Management: Theory, Concepts and Methods. Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
8. Cvetković, V. M. (2025). First responders in the Western Balkans: Strengthening Capacities and Preparedness for a Resilient Future. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 361–384.
9. Cvetković, V. M., & Šišović, V. (2024). Understanding the Sustainable Development of Community (Social) Disaster Resilience in Serbia: Demographic and Socio-Economic Impacts. Sustainability, 16(7), 2620.
10. Cvetković, V. M., Aleksova, B., Renner, R., Gačić, J., Ivanov, A., & Milašinović, S. (2025). Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction: Overcoming Barriers to Build Stronger Communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 113–130.
11. Cvetković, V. M., Milenković, D., Bašić, J., Lukić, T., & Renner, R. (2026). Predictive Model of Community Disaster Resilience Across Serbia: A BRIC–DROP Composite Index and Spatial Patterns. Safety, 12(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12030059
12. Cvetković, V. M., Nikolić, N., & Lukić, T. (2024). Exploring Students’ and Teachers’ Insights on School-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Safety: A Case Study of Western Morava Basin, Serbia. Safety, 10(2), 50.
13. Cvetković, V. M., Renner, R., Aleksova, B., & Lukić, T. (2024). Geospatial and Temporal Patterns of Natural and Man-Made (Technological) Disasters (1900–2024): Insights from Different Socio-Economic and Demographic Perspectives. Applied Sciences, 14(18), 8129.
14. Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38.
15. Government of Bangladesh. (2012). Disaster Management Act, 2012. Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief. https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/bangladesh-disaster-management-act-2012
16. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315585950
17. Habiba, U., Shaw, R., & Abedin, M. A. (2013). Community-based disaster risk reduction approaches in Bangladesh. In Disaster risk reduction approaches in Bangladesh (pp. 259- 279). Tokyo: Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_12
18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
19. Haque, C. E., & Uddin, M. R. (2013). Disaster management discourse in Bangladesh: A shift from response to risk reduction. In I. Pal, R. Shaw, F. Mallick, & A. Islam (Eds.), Disaster risk governance in Bangladesh (pp. 39–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_3
20. Heinze, G., & Schemper, M. (2002). A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2409–2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
21. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley.
22. Islam, R., & Walkerden, G. (2014). How bonding and bridging networks contribute to disaster resilience and recovery on the Bangladeshi coast. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 10, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.016
23. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE Publications.
24. Karmaker, R. (2025). Stray dogs in urban Bangladesh: A zoonotic disaster risk and policy challenge. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.5
25. Karmaker, R., & Cvetković, V. M. (2025). Digital literacy and educational empowerment among rural women in Bangladesh: Bridging the technology access gap. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.13
26. Kayes, A. N. M., Tabassum, T., & Khan, M. A. M. R. (2025). Assessment of climate-induced vulnerabilities and poverty alleviation potential of dry fish industry: An ecological and socio-economic study in Cox’s Bazar District, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(1), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.26
27. Menard, S. (2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. SAGE Publications.
28. Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief. (2020). National Plan for Disaster Management (NPDM) 2021–2025. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
29. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. European Comission, Ispra, 15(1), 19-20.
30. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
31. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en
32. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
33. Paul, B. K., & Dutt, S. (2010). Hazard warnings and responses to evacuation orders: The case of Bangladesh’s Cyclone Sidr. Geographical Review, 100(3), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00040.x
34. Paul, S. K., Naim, J., & Mou, M. A. (2022). Assessing efficiency of disaster management institutions at local level in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Nature-Based Solutions, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100024
35. Rahman, M. M., Sarker, S., Biswas, A., Roy, S., & Mahmud, M. A. (2025). Exploring flood-induced livelihood vulnerabilities in Bangladesh: Insights from Teota, Manikganj and the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.18
36. Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute.
37. Salam, M. F., Hemel, U., Roni, H., Pandith, J. C., and Maeesha, N. (2025). Grassroots disaster governance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 7(2), 395-404.
38. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
39. Tuhkanen, H. (2023). Shifting power through participation in post-disaster recovery: A scoping review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 97, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104041
40. Uddin, M. S., Haque, C. E., & Khan, M. N. (2021). Good governance and local-level policy implementation for disaster risk reduction: Actual, perceptual, and contested perspectives in coastal communities in Bangladesh. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 30(2), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2020-0069
41. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2020). Disaster risk reduction in Bangladesh: Status report 2020. UNDRR. https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/disaster-risk-reduction-bangladesh-status-report-2020-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Taimur Rahaman Tamim, Md. Faisal, Milton Kumar Saha, Joy Boiddho, Vladimir M. Cvetković (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal operates under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, adaptation, and transformation in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
Authors retain the copyright of their articles.
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Management (IJDRM) encourages and permits authors to:
-
Post pre-print (submitted version), post-print (accepted version), and publisher’s version/PDF of their articles on personal websites, institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and academic networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, or departmental websites,
-
Do so at any time, including before or after publication,
-
Provided that appropriate credit is given to the original publication in this journal, including:
-
Full bibliographic details
-
A clear mention of the journal name
-
A direct link to the article’s DOI (as an HTML link)
-
No prior permission is required from the publisher or editors for such actions, as long as the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license are followed.